Friday, May 31, 2019
Contrasting Genesis I and II of the Holy Bible Essay -- comparison com
Contrasting coevals I and II Where contemporaries I describes a much ordered basis - the manifestation of a more old cultural influence than was responsible for the multi-layered creation in Genesis II - the second creation story focuses less on an etiological justification for the physiologic world and examines the ramifications of humankinds existence and relationship with God. Instead of Genesis Is simple and repetitive refrains of and God saw that it was good (Gen 112, 18, 21, 25), Genesis II features a more stylistically advanced look at the solar mean solar day that the maestro God made the earth and the heavens (Gen 24). While both stories represent polar versions of the same Biblical event, Genesis II is importantly more complex than its predecessor and serves both to quantify the relationship between God and his creations and lay the pes for the evolving story of humankind as well. Though the dickens Creation stories are supposedly intended to be connected - even interchangeable - the only law of similarity they share is the presence of the omnipotent God and His agency in the creation of the earth. Where the first creation describes a detailed, six-day process in which God first delineates day and night, establishes the physical world, and then finally creates man, the second creation is a much simpler process, one almost contradictory to the first storys strict schedule. In the day that the overlord God made the earth and the heavens, when no coif of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up - for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one to till the ground but a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole strikingness of the ground - t... ...nt in both style and content. Where Genesis I portrays a creation in which an omnipotent God forms order from chaos and places mankind at the center of this new world, Genesis II delves deeper into the roles and ori gins of man and woman and their reason for existence. This juxtaposition of simple story and deeper meaning further illustrate the Hebrew cultures social evolution and its conscious shift to a old system - a parallel transition from chaos to order. Works Cited Countryman, William. What Can the Bibles Creation Narrative identify Us? Washington, DC Integrity. 1992. Fox, Robin Lane. The Unauthorized interpretation Truth and Fiction in the Bible. New York Vintage, 1991. Ingersoll, Robert G. About the Holy Bible. N.p n.p, 1894. Spong, John Shelby. Creation Narrative invention or Reality? San Francisco Harper Collins, 1994. Contrasting Genesis I and II of the Holy Bible Essay -- comparison comContrasting Genesis I and II Where Genesis I describes a more ordered creation - the manifestation of a more primitive cultural influence than was responsible for the multi-layered creation in Genesis II - the second creation story focuses less on an etiological justificatio n for the physical world and examines the ramifications of humankinds existence and relationship with God. Instead of Genesis Is simple and repetitive refrains of and God saw that it was good (Gen 112, 18, 21, 25), Genesis II features a more stylistically advanced look at the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens (Gen 24). While both stories represent different versions of the same Biblical event, Genesis II is significantly more complex than its predecessor and serves both to quantify the relationship between God and his creations and lay the foundation for the evolving story of humankind as well. Though the two Creation stories are supposedly intended to be connected - even interchangeable - the only similarity they share is the presence of the omnipotent God and His role in the creation of the earth. Where the first creation describes a detailed, six-day process in which God first delineates day and night, establishes the physical world, and then finally creates m an, the second creation is a much simpler process, one almost contradictory to the first storys strict schedule. In the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up - for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one to till the ground but a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole face of the ground - t... ...nt in both style and content. Where Genesis I portrays a creation in which an omnipotent God forms order from chaos and places mankind at the center of this new world, Genesis II delves deeper into the roles and origins of man and woman and their reason for existence. This juxtaposition of simple story and deeper meaning further illustrate the Hebrew cultures societal evolution and its conscious shift to a patriarchal system - a parallel transition from chaos to order. Works Cited Countryman, William. What Can the Bibles Creation Nar rative Tell Us? Washington, DC Integrity. 1992. Fox, Robin Lane. The Unauthorized Version Truth and Fiction in the Bible. New York Vintage, 1991. Ingersoll, Robert G. About the Holy Bible. N.p n.p, 1894. Spong, John Shelby. Creation Narrative Myth or Reality? San Francisco Harper Collins, 1994.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.